Small Press Publisher Award
Criteria for the AWP Small Press Publisher Award
The AWP Small Press Publisher Award is for presses or journals that have consistently demonstrated excellence in the following: quality and discernment in curatorship of published work, quality of content, quality of editing, and skill and innovation in design. Nominees will be committed to nurturing the talents of their published authors, supporting their literary communities, and actively engaging in consistent and effective public engagement and outreach.
The AWP Small Press Publisher award will be given to a press or journal that has made significant contributions to contemporary literature.
· The nominee will be a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization.
· The nominee will have participated in at least three previous AWP bookfairs, which may include the bookfair held in the year in which they are nominated.
· The nominee will have been in operation for five years or more at the time of its nomination.
· The winner must travel to the AWP conference to receive the award.
Guidelines for Letters of Nomination
Letters of nomination should include an explanation of how the nonprofit press or literary journal fulfills the criteria above, a detailed explanation of how the nominated organization has contributed to the literary landscape, demonstrated consistent excellence in the criteria above, and demonstrated commitment to nurturing authors.
Letters should be no longer than two single-spaced pages. Letters should include the name, return address, and signature of the nominating person as well as contact information for a representative of the organization nominated who can accept the award on behalf of the organization. All nominations should be in PDF format and submitted through AWP's Submittable portal. Postal submissions will not be considered. An employee of an organization may not nominate his or her own organization for the award.
George Garrett Award for Outstanding Community Service in Literature
The award will be given to an individual who has demonstrated exceptional generosity to writers by excellent work in one or more of the following activities:
• Teaching creative writing and literature;
• Serving as a mentor, supporter, or guide to writers;
• Publishing or editing literature, especially works by emerging or neglected talents;
• Building new resources that benefit writers (reading series, presses, awards, endowments, fellowships, stipends, programs, community centers, foundations, etc.);
• Administering to programs or institutions that benefit writers or that expand audiences for contemporary authors; and
• Working generally to make North America a more supportive place for contemporary literature and its makers.
To receive the award, the recipient must be willing to travel to the AWP annual conference.
Any living individual who meets the above criteria may be nominated for the award except for the following: members of the current AWP board or staff; family members of the AWP board or staff; and former AWP trustees or staff who served AWP within the last four years. A former trustee or employee of AWP may be nominated for the award only after at least four years have lapsed between the deadline for nominations and his or her last official day of service to AWP. Previous recipients of the award may not be nominated or considered. Self-nominations will not be considered.
Letters of Nomination
Anyone, nonmember or member of AWP, may submit a letter of nomination. Nomination letters should feature the following:
• An explanation of how your nominee fulfills the criteria.
• Specificity. Please note where the nominee did good works, length of service, names of writers helped, or detailed descriptions of what your nominee did or built in support of writers.
• Brevity. Your letter of nomination should be no longer than two pages, single-spaced, in a 12-point font.
• Attribution. The date, your name, return address, email address, and signature must appear on your letter.
• The Award Committee reviews over 100 letters each year. Please prepare your letter with care.
Letters of nomination are accepted each year between August 1 and September 30, and should be uploaded here. Please address letters of nomination to:
Association of Writers & Writing Programs
5700 Rivertech Ct, Suite 225
Riverdale Park, MD 20737-1250
Duration of Active Nominations
Letters of nomination will remain in active consideration for three years, for three cycles of the process of adjudication. If you submit your letter in 2019, for instance, your letter of nomination will remain active until the end of the 2021 cycle of deliberations.
Each year the AWP Board of Trustees and Staff choose three individuals from AWP’s general membership to serve as judges of the nominees. This Award Committee of three judges ranks and selects the recipient of the award. AWP selects new judges each year. As is the case with other literary awards, the deliberations of the judges are confidential.
For information about the award's namesake author and for a list of past winners, please visit AWP's website.
AWP's mentorship program, Writer to Writer, matches emerging writers and published authors for a three-month series of modules on topics such as craft, revision, publishing, and the writing life. Mentors volunteer their time and receive a free one-year AWP membership. Writer to Writer is free of charge to mentees.
Our program is open to all AWP members. We receive between 300 and 400 mentee applications a season and 50–60 mentor applications. We are usually able to match 25–30 pairs. We choose mentors after considering the specific needs present in the mentee applications that session. When reviewing mentor applications, we are also looking for responses that demonstrate an understanding of the special nature of a good mentor-mentee relationship, and that the applicant shows a willingness to be supportive, responsive, and receptive to learning from the experience. Most mentors say that they want to serve in this program because they had a mentor who helped them, and now they long to give back. Others say that they long to be the mentor they wish they'd had.
Should you be chosen to participate, you will be given several applications to review and select your own mentee. Mentors tend to choose mentees based on shared goals and interests, and whether they feel they can help that person at the stage they are in now. Our mentees come from all backgrounds and levels of experience, and we particularly encourage applications from those who have never been affiliated with an MFA program, and those writing from backgrounds, regions, and perspectives often underrepresented in the literary world. You will have opportunities to interact with the other mentors taking part in that session, and AWP's membership team will be there with you, every step of the way.
Our Fall 2021 session begins in late September and will consist of six lightly structured modules over a three-month period, concluding in December. You and your partner will make a commitment to the process—and to each other. Together, you will decide whether phone, Skype, email, or a mix of communication styles would be the best way to complete the modules. Mentors agree to be available for a minimum of two hours per month by phone; you will be asked to respond to emails from your partner within two days. You need not strictly follow the program modules, but we ask that you and your mentor mutually agree before departing from them.
Please carefully consider what other commitments already exist on your schedule before applying as a mentor so you can give your mentee and the program meaningful attention.
There is no charge to apply. Mentor applications can be submitted year-round.
The more detailed you are in your responses to the questionnaire that follows, the easier it will be for us to find great potential matches for you.
Thank you for wishing to serve as a Writer to Writer mentor!
AWP presents the best contemporary writing in its flagship
magazine the Writer’s Chronicle, as
well as on our website through Online-Only Exclusives, short blog pieces on the Writer’s Notebook, and articles
giving job advice in our Career Advice section.
The Editors read submissions for the Writer’s Chronicle from February 1 through September 30 of each
year. Submissions for the Writer’s Notebook and the Career Advice section are read
throughout the year. Please review our guidelines below.
About the Writer’s
Published four times during the academic year, the Writer’s
Chronicle strives to
the best essays on the craft and art of writing poetry, fiction, and
overcome academic overspecialization and balkanization of the literary
arts by presenting a public forum for the appreciation, debate, and
analysis of contemporary literature;
the diversity of accomplishments and points of view within contemporary
serious and committed writers and students of writing the best advice on
how to manage their professional lives;
writers who teach with new pedagogical approaches for their classrooms;
members and subscribers with a literary community as a respite from devotion
to a difficult and lonely art;
members and subscribers with information on publishing opportunities,
grants, and awards; and
the good works of AWP, its programs, and its individual members.
In general, the editors look for articles that demonstrate
an excellent working knowledge of literary issues and a generosity of spirit
that esteems the arguments of other writers on similar topics. In writing
essays on craft, writers are often tempted to use their own work as an example.
The editors do not welcome such articles. For our readers, we provide the model
of a writer reading another writer carefully and productively. Please keep in
mind that 18,000 of our 35,000 readers are students or just-emerging writers.
They must become expert readers before they can become accomplished writers,
and we therefore expect essays on craft to show exemplary close readings of a
variety of contemporary and older works. Essays must embody erudition,
generosity, curiosity, and discernment rather than self-involvement. Writers
may refer to their own travails and successes if they do so modestly, in small
proportion to the other examples. Again, we look for a generosity of spirit—a
general love and command of literature as well as an expert, writerly
viewpoint—in the essays we publish.
What We Pay
We buy first serial rights and electronic rights for all
manuscripts accepted for publication. We pay $18 per 100 words for accepted
manuscripts. Regretfully, we do not pay kill fees. Authors are paid upon
publication. We reserve the right to publish articles from the Writer’s
Chronicle electronically on AWP’s website and the Chronicle App.
To propose an essay or interview for consideration for the Writer’s Chronicle, please email editor
Supriya Bhatnagar at <email@example.com>.
What We Publish
Submissions to the Writer’s Chronicle may fall into
one of the following categories:
Interviews: 4,000 to 7,000
The Writer’s Chronicle features interviews with
well-known and up-and-coming authors of note in the genres of fiction, short
fiction, poetry, creative nonfiction, and other forms of creative writing. In
the past, we have published interviews with such authors as Nikki Finney,
Ernest Gaines, WS Merwin, Sonia Sanchez, George Saunders, Jane Smiley, Arthur
Sze, and many others. We especially appreciate interviews that include
discussions of writing craft, the evolution of the author’s own work, and
literary influences and inspirations. Please query before submitting an
interview. We publish interviews between 4,000 and 7,000 words. Interviews
should include a two-paragraph introduction to the author, including all
pertinent biographical information. This introduction should be mainly factual.
We are not interested in an interview that is faithful to an actual spoken
event. We are not interested in how friendly you are with the subject, or what
the subject was wearing that day, or when and where the interview was
conducted, etc. We prefer interviews that have been revised heavily in the
interest of accuracy, concision, and style. We are interested in an interview
that represents a writer as well as possible in a somewhat personable and
discursive manner. We do not publish interviews unless the subject has had an
opportunity to revise his or her comments, and we encourage the interviewers
and their subjects to revise their transcripts of the interviews extensively.
We only publish interviews that have been approved in proofs by their subjects.
Sorry, No Lectures,
Talks, & Panel Discussions
Transcripts of lectures, talks, and panel discussions do not
appear in our pages, but we do often publish essays that are adapted from such
events. Many panel discussions, though engaging in person, are disappointing in
the cool medium of print. As with interviews, we are not interested in
transcripts of actual spoken events; we prefer articles that acknowledge
sources and the other writers who have pondered the same topic (which one may
sometimes overlook when one speaks informally); we prefer articles that are
more elegantly organized and concisely written than the somewhat improvisatory
ruminations of a panel discussion. We seldom publish all the presentations of
any given panel discussion, so you should adapt your discussion to read well as
a freestanding essay.
Essays on Pedagogy: 2,500 to
Often, AWP will publish essays concerning creative writing
pedagogy in the Online-Only Exclusives section of the website. The most
successful pedagogy pieces combine research, interviews, and teaching
experience. Pedagogy pieces are not diatribes about the quality of a writer’s
own education or an argument against a specific teacher’s methodology. The
pedagogy essay is an opportunity to inform and educate your peers about
different methodologies of teaching, and should always be directed towards the
writing community-at-large. Pedagogy pieces are generally between 2,500 and
Appreciations: 2,000 to 5,000
The Writer’s Chronicle publishes appreciations of
contemporary writers whose work came into prominence after 1965. Appreciations
are not profiles or memoirs; instead, we seek close readings of an important
author’s work and an analysis of the author’s contributions to our culture and
to the mastery of craft. You may include some personal anecdotes to portray the
author more vividly, but mostly self-referential or sentimental appreciations,
of course, are not acceptable. The appreciation should answer the questions:
What can I as a writer learn from this writer? What has this writer contributed
to our culture? Appreciations are generally between 2,000 and 5,000 words.
Essays on the Craft of
Writing: 2,000 to 6,000 words
All craft essays must analyze an element of creative
writing. Articles should not overlap with topics covered in recent issues of
the Chronicle. Craft essays should
contain concrete examples to illustrate the writerly advice they offer. Many of
our published essays combine appreciations (as described above) with a study of
elements of craft. Using more than one author to illustrate your analysis is recommended.
A query on a specific topic is always welcome. Craft essays run between 2,000
and 6,000 words, depending on the topic.
We currently accept submissions via Submittable as well as
through postal mail. Essays longer than 7,000 words are generally not accepted.
Simultaneous submissions are not encouraged and must be noted as such on your
cover letter. If we do not respond to your submission within three months, you
are free to send your work elsewhere. Electronic queries are acceptable, but email
submissions will not be considered.
Please follow the Chicago
Manual of Style. Acknowledge your sources by using endnotes. Do not follow MLA
style, which is well-designed for professional readers but annoying to general
readers, in whom we still have great faith. Previously published works are unacceptable.
We will, however, publish an accepted work before or the same month it also
appears in a book.
If you quote a poem, song, or short-short story in its
entirety, it is your responsibility to secure and pay for that permission. We
recommend that you limit quotes to fair use and avoid quoting whole works, as
many trade publishers charge high fees for permissions.
How to Submit Online
Visit awp.submittable.com. Choose the appropriate category and enter your
contact information. Please upload your submission as a single file in .doc,
.docx, .rtf, or .pdf formats. Include cover letter and bio information in the
space provided on the submission form.
In the Classroom’s teaching guides are devoted to a single essay or interview from a past issue of the Chronicle, and are intended to be a resource for teachers of any and all genres, backgrounds, and experience levels, at colleges and community centers, looking to make their classroom a more enriching, rewarding, and inclusive environment for all. Guides should be 500 – 700 words in length and should follow the template. The template can be downloaded from the submission guidelines page on the AWP website. If you have any questions about this opportunity, please send us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org.